Tagged with cloud adoption

The cloud shifts the CIO’s role to “Chief Data Officer”

The longer I’m in tech, the more inclined I am to accept the truth of William Gibson’s quote: “The future is already here — it’s just not very evenly distributed.”  I saw this firsthand with a wealthy friend, who could afford to “see the future” by buying essentially unlimited broadband, powerful servers/computers, and more, and figuring out what the world would look like when average consumers could afford the same.

Sometimes, however, cost isn’t the gatekeeper to the future, but a willingness to risk is.  Such is the case with the cloud.

Google CIO Ben Fried thinks we’re nearing the tipping point for cloud computing, when CIOs determine that cloud computing’s cost and simplicity advantages outweigh other concerns like a lack of customizability, and jump in with both feet.  Sure, enterprises are already using cloud services: 86 percent according to Cloudability data; 81 percent by KPMG’s survey count; and 48 percent for SMBs, according to a recent survey.  But few big enterprises are using the cloud to handle the majority of their workloads.

In the future, according to Fried’s thinking, that will change.

Amazon is destined to displace big iron vendors like IBM and HP as the cloud becomes the preferred destination for enterprise computing, including mission critical workloads.  Just as Linux used to be relegated to the fringe of computing but came to dominate the heart of the data center so, too, will the cloud wreak havoc on the traditional data center business.

By taking technology out of the IT equation, Fried argues that cloud computing changes the way businesses structure themselves and do business, and may even force them to change the business they’re in altogether.  In many ways, cloud computing lets enterprises focus on the data that results from IT, rather than the IT itself.  This is a huge shift.

This isn’t to suggest that enterprises will completely forget about servers and such, but it does mean that they’ll think about compute resources differently, and will almost certainly have to think of new ways to keep tabs on them.  Companies like Boundary and Nodeable were built in the cloud for cloud resources, and focus more on surfacing actionable insights than on giving administrators or developers the tools to “spelunk” for themselves, which is inefficient and largely unnecessary in a world of semi-structured data accessed through APIs.

All of which would be a really bad idea if the cloud were just a fad.  But it’s not.  It’s how IT gets done going forward.  And it means that the Chief Information Officer is going to need to recalibrate the way she thinks about “Information.”  Namely, more a matter of “data” and less a matter of “technology.”

Tagged , , , , , ,

Public cloud: it’s open source all over again

Public cloud adoption largely follows the same pattern as open source adoption, and is having to overcome the same myths that once inhibited widespread adoption of open source.  Security, control, and quality are the red herring arguments that traditional software vendors used to slow the spread of open source, and these same arguments are being resurrected to stem the flow of public cloud adoption.  But it won’t work, just as it failed to stop open source.  And as Red Hat has been cleaning up in the open source revenues sweepstakes, Amazon should win big as the public cloud continues to win converts.

By some estimates, Amazon’s share of the public cloud computing market (IaaS) is as high as 90 per cent.  This doesn’t make it invulnerable – Enstratus’ James Urquhart points to a variety of ways to unseat AWS – but it won’t be for the faint of heart, and current competitors seem mostly to be getting their messaging wrong.  Companies like Alcatel-Lucent try to categorize AWS as “coach class” while their clouds are “first class,”  but the masses seem very happy with a coach class experience in the cloud.  It’s cheap, reliable, and gets them where they want to go.

The next argument plays to the CIO’s biggest concern with the public cloud: security.  How can it possibly be safe to entrust mission-critical applications to the public cloud?  This was the same argument that kept Linux to edge-of-network sort of applications in its early days.  As the story went, Linux would never succeed in the data center.  Who could trust some community science project to mission-critical applications in the data center?

Well, today, who wouldn’t?

This is the same thing that is happening in the public cloud, and particularly with AWS, and it’s been growing on the sly for years, for reasons highlighted by R0ml Lefkowitz back at OSBC 2008 (warning: PDF).  The general adoption pattern goes like this: a developer needs to get work done, and going through traditional IT channels will either take too long or will get killed.  So she puts it up on AWS.  Perhaps she starts with dev and test instances, but soon her team becomes dependent on it and asks the question, “Why redeploy this somewhere else?  Why not just put it into production on AWS, since it works?”  And soon that enterprise is actively deploying to AWS because it’s cost effective, secure, and it works.

Yes, secure.  Amazon claims that AWS is significantly more secure than the average private data center, and there’s every reason to believe this claim.  As Jason Bloomberg argues, Amazon hires the best security people, uses the best hardware, and has experience dealing with constant security threats.  It’s not that there aren’t some private data centers that might be more secure than Amazon’s public cloud, but the odds are that they aren’t.

Once people discover this freedom of the public cloud, and its cost and security advantages, the way they manage their infrastructure also changes.  Right now, Netflix is on the bleeding edge of public cloud adoption, but its mantra of “disposable infrastructure” will soon find its way into the mainstream enterprise.  Why spend days or even hours performing root cause analysis on system failures when it takes mere seconds to spin up a new AMI to replace the failing node?

Old-school systems management, then, becomes largely irrelevant in the cloud, because it focuses too much attention on the past.  The cloud is all about watching current trends and anticipating problems, flexibly deploying configuration changes or whatever is needed to overcome problems.  This is what Nodeable and a new breed of cloud “management” tools do: focus on visibility into cloud infrastructure, rather than the tools to fix past problems.

For those of us who lived through the open source adoption curve, the public cloud adoption curve looks very familiar.  As with open source, it will change the way everyone develops, deploys, and manages software.  It may be that Amazon won’t retain its dominance forever, but its model of exceptional service at rock-bottom prices is going to be hard to beat.  Just like open source.

Tagged , ,
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 52 other followers

%d bloggers like this: